MANY
OBSERVERS have concluded that, if elected, John McCain will continue
the failed policies of the past eight years. They are right, but they
don’t go far enough. He will actually make many of them far worse. For
working families — including Boilermaker families — a McCain presidency
would be a disaster.
McCain opposes everything this union stands for. He not only opposes
increases to the minimum wage, he opposes the minimum wage itself and
voted to abolish
it.[1] He opposes Davis-Bacon,[2] a law that protects the wages of workers on federally-funded construction projects. He opposes the Jones Act,[3]
a law requiring that ships carrying goods or passengers from one U.S.
port to another U.S. port be built in the United States. He opposes
“Buy American” laws.[4]
He opposes project labor agreements.[5] He opposes union security.[6] He opposes the Employee Free Choice
Act,[7] a law that gives
workers who want to organize their place of employment a fighting
chance. In fact, he opposes labor unions in every way and on every
level. He says the right to organize a union amounts to “class warfare.”
McCain voted to block OSHA from implementing standards to protect workers from repetitive stress injuries.[8] Now he says every regulation should be revisited to determine whether it imposes a burden on employers.[9]
He voted to use the Social Security surplus to pay off the national debt — one year after voting for the Bush tax cuts[10]
that added $2 trillion to that debt. Now he proposes raising the
minimum retirement age and reducing cost-of-living raises, but refuses
to consider making high-income wage earners pay the same Social
Security tax rate as low income wage earners.[11]
Throughout his campaign, he has claimed he will put more money in the
hands of average Americans. But when he had the chance last year, he
didn’t even bother to show up to vote for the stimulus package that
sent rebate checks of $600 to $1,200 to middle-class working families.[12]
John McCain appears to have no idea what life is like for working
families. Perhaps that is because he hasn’t “walked a mile” in our
shoes. The son of a four-star admiral married to an oil heiress, he has
never had to struggle to make ends meet, never been laid off when the
plant he worked at closed down, never had to do without when his
paycheck wouldn’t stretch to cover all his needs.
Now he is married to an heiress himself, the daughter of a successful
beer distributor. Their combined wealth is nearly $100 million. I don’t
begrudge them their money, but I want you to understand why he cannot
relate to the life you live. When a reporter asked him how many homes
he and his wife own, he said he’d have one of his staff look into that
and get back.
He couldn’t remember how many houses he owned! A person with that kind
of wealth has to make a concerted effort to understand how someone who
works for a living thinks, and John McCain has never made that effort.
Barack Obama does understand the lives working families live. For part
of his childhood, he was raised by a single parent. He learned early
that working families must struggle to survive, and after he graduated
from Harvard Law School, he turned down offers to work for large law
firms to become a community organizer in a working-class Chicago
neighborhood ravaged by the closing of a steel mill, its main employer.
Organizers are a curious breed. Whether organizing a labor union or a
community, they succeed by inspiring people to work hard to improve
their own position in life. A successful organizer does not create
change on his own — the people he organizes are the ones who make
change happen. In that Chicago community, Obama demonstrated he is a
true leader, a person who can inspire others to follow him as he helps
them unlock the doors to a better life.
An Obama presidency promises a world of change from the Bush
administration of the past eight years — and in fact, from any
administration in almost 50 years. No candidate since John F. Kennedy
has invigorated the nation’s youth as Barack Obama has, and no
candidate since Franklin Roosevelt has been so committed to struggling
against the injustices and economic hardships felt every day by working families.
The choice is yours
ON ELECTION DAY, you will vote as your conscience dictates. Who you
support is your decision and yours alone. I urge you to be a
responsible voter — to study the candidates’ records, positions, and
proposals in light of how they will affect you, your family, and the
millions of other working families across the country. Information
about the candidates and videos of them explaining their positions are
available through
our Web site, www.boilermakers.org.
I urge you to read about the candidates and listen to McCain explain
his positions, so you can see how out of touch he is with the world you
and I live in.
When you do, I believe you will see that your choice is clear.
You can vote for the candidate who has refused to accept campaign
donations from lobbyists or the one who not only accepts their
donations, but hires them to be his campaign advisors.
You can vote for the candidate who has vowed to end tax incentives for
companies that move jobs overseas or the one who proclaimed he “would
negotiate a trade agreement with almost any country.”[13]
You can vote for the candidate whose health care plan makes coverage affordable for every American[14] or the one who wants to tax the health care benefits you get
from your employer.[15]
You can vote for the candidate who believes workers need greater
security for their pensions and a stronger Social Security or the one
who has voted to privatize Social Security and wants to raise the
eligibility age for Medicare.
You can vote for the candidate who will give companies tax breaks for
creating jobs in the United States or the one who said, “I firmly
object to Buy American laws.”
You can vote for the candidate who supports the Employee Free Choice Act[16] or the one who supports a national so-called “right-to-work” law[17] that eliminates union security in collective
bargaining agreements.
You can vote for a champion of the working people who knows how to work
with unions or the one who believes the right to unionize amounts to
“class warfare.”
You can vote for the candidate who promises a change from the failed
policies of the Bush administration or the one who has supported
President Bush 89 percent of the time.
You can vote for the candidate who understands the struggles and needs
of working families and has dedicated his life to helping us improve
our lives or the one who consistently opposes the laws that help
working families.
You can vote for the candidate who has promised to cut taxes for
middle-class Americans and retirees or the one who has promised to cut
taxes for corporations and the wealthy.
In other words, you can vote for Barack Obama or you can vote for John McCain.
I hope you choose wisely. The nation’s future and your family’s future are riding on it.
Paid for by the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Campaign
Assistance Fund, [phone: (703) 560-1493] and is not authorized by any
candidate
or candidate's committee.
[1]S.Amdt. 116 to S.Amdt. 100 to H.R. 2, Vote 24, 1/24/07; H.R. 2, Vote
23, 1/24/07; Vote 25, 1/25/07; Vote 37, 1/31/07; Vote 39,
1/31/07; Vote 42, 1/31/07)
[2]S Amdt. 4031 to S.C.R. 57, Vote 134, 5/22/96; H.R. 10, Vote 239, 7/12/83
[3]International Organization of Masters, Mates, and Pilots, www.bridgedeck.org/WhatsNew.htm
[4]McCain Amdt. No. 3461 to S.Amdt. 3197 to S.2400, Vote 135, 6/22/04; McCain Amdt. No. 783 to S. 1050, Vote 191, 5/21/03
[5]Associated Builders and Contractors PAC
[6]S. 1788, Vote 188, 7/10/96
[7]Congressional Record, page S8389, 6/26/07; H.R. 800, Vote 227, 6/26/07
[8]S.J.Res. 6, Vote 15, 3/6/01
[9]Associated Builders and Contractors PAC
[10]S. 2020, Vote #26, 11/18/05
[11]Wall Street Journal,
3/3/08; S.C.R. 83, Voe 68, 3/16/06; S.Amdt. 489 to S.C.R. 21, Vote 89,
3/22/07; S.C.R. 86, Vote 56, 4/1/98; S.C.R. 86, Vote 77,
4/1/98
[12]Phoenix Business Journal, 2/7/08
[13]Speech to National Press Club, 5/20/99
[14]Campaign Web site; Speech in Iowa City, Iowa, 5/29/07
[15]Health08.org, Forum, 10/31/07; Los Angeles Times, 11/20/07; Center for American Progress, 4/9/08
[16] H.R. 800, Vote 227, 6/26/07; Chicago Tribune, 3/4/07;
S.Amdt. 316 to S. Amdt. 275 to S. 4, Vote 64, 3/7/07; Illinois State
Senate, S.B. 90, 2003; Campaign Web site, accessed 6/12/08
[17]S. 1788, Vote 188, 7/10/96
Comments